AI coding tools have quietly become the most productivity-boosting category in software. A good code assistant doesn't just autocomplete - it understands your entire codebase, catches bugs before they ship, and explains unfamiliar code in plain English. Developers who adopt these tools early report writing 30-50% more code per day.
IDE integration
Does it work inside VS Code, JetBrains, or your editor of choice? A tool that forces you to context-switch kills flow.
Codebase awareness
Can it index your entire repo for context, or does it only see the current file? Whole-repo context makes suggestions dramatically more useful.
Language support
Check your primary languages carefully. Most tools handle Python, JavaScript, and TypeScript well. Support for Go, Rust, or niche languages varies.
Privacy and security
Does your code leave your machine? Enterprise teams should check data retention policies carefully before enabling code completion on proprietary codebases.
For most developers, yes - the $10/month pays back quickly in time saved. That said, free tiers from Cursor and Codeium are genuinely capable and worth trying first.
The concern is real but manageable. AI tools are most dangerous when developers accept code without understanding it. Used actively - asking why, not just accepting what - they can actually accelerate learning.
Code assistants (Copilot, Cursor) work inside your IDE alongside your normal workflow. App builders (Bolt, Lovable) let you describe an app in natural language and generate full working code - no IDE required. They target different skill levels and use cases.
Anthropic's thoughtful AI for writing, analysis, and coding
